Body dissatisfaction. In order to measure body dissatisfaction (difference between actual and ideal figure) and internalization of the ideal thin figure (defined as the selection of a thin silhouette from a group of silhouettes of various body sizes), a set of 10 silhouettes assumed to be neutral to ethnicity, culture, and details (Figure 1) was used. A German work group (Jaeger, Massoubre & Lamprecht, 2000) originally developed these for a previous multi-cross-cultural study in a three-stdecades peer revision procedure. Four questions were asked in relation to the silhouette scales: « Please mark with a cross the silhouette that best represents the current shape of your body »; « What do you wish you looked like? »; « What is the most attractive silhouette in your opinion? »; « What do you find the most attractive silhouette in the opposite sex? » Participants were asked to mark with a cross the position representing their attitudes on a 0-10 decimal scale (Figure 1); positions between the two silhouettes were allowed and coded as real numbers. tt= 0.82 (« actual »); Rtt= 0.77 (« ideal »); Rtt= 0.71 (« attractive »); and those of convergent validity as: Rcit= 0.73 (« actual » and BMI). The procedures followed by the authors, as well as the psychometric features, are described in detail elsewhere (Jaeger et al., 2002; Jaeger et al., 2000).
Slimming down discipline is measured from the Dietary Size of Eating Thinking Sample (EAT) (Gather, Olmsted, Bohr & Garfinkel, 1982), composed of sixteen statements scored towards the a great 6-area measure (never ever = 0/usually = 5), which have high score exhibiting an advanced out-of restrained dining. Toward Eat psychometrical features pick Garner mais aussi al. (1982). https://lovingwomen.org/es/blog/mejores-paises-que-aman-a-los-hombres-estadounidenses/ The new texture coefficient for both examples, brand new North american country and you may Italian language of these, is of the same worthy of, an alpha of 0.76.
Diet discipline
Ineffectiveness scale. The brand new bad connect with grounds try estimated from the Ineffectiveness Measure out of the brand new Food Issues List (EDI) (Garner ainsi que al., 1983), that has shown good convergent validity (ineffectiveness/self confidence ) out of Roentgen = 0.70 (p
Scientific teams grabbed the weight and peak tips
Bmi (BMI). Body mass index are calculated while the weight when you look at the kilograms divided from the level in rectangular meters (Bmi = kg/m2).
In advance of data range, good pilot study of the fresh Silhouettes Size (Figure step one), placed on an example consisting of 20 North american country people, was applied to check on the latest appropriateness of your own data to represent human body products, to help you validate an excellent acceptation off an unidentified gang of silhouettes and you will a clear comprehension of brand new rules (new German classification currently measured that have study contained in this respect). The outcomes presented the newest Silhouette Level are an excellent or an enthusiastic suitable means into the North american country test.
The brand new investigators of the two places, at the Mexico Urban area at Hae (standardized) techniques. The latest questionnaires were placed on categories of medical and you may nursing pupils within Mexican and you can German colleges. A primary reason behind the ples out-of college students associated with drug try only the interest you to definitely (it’s possible to guess) these types of young people need to have into the scientific field and for health conditions, making them significantly more responsive to trouble particularly ED. Informed consent is taken from every study people. All called college students wanted to engage. This new respective regional integrity committees accepted the brand new non-intrusive procedure. Professional translators undertook and you can managed the fresh new translation and you will retranslation of your own devices.
Age. The mean age of Mexican women (Mage = 20.4, SD = 0.49) and German women (Mage = 20.8, SD = 1.0) differed statistically: t(346)= 4.29, p = 0.000. It is important to note that we expected not to find a significant difference in this variable, but a minimal difference of a few tenths (0.4) resulted in a significant one, most likely due to the large size of the total sample, since in separate structural analysis, age accounted for
