Pilkington CJ, Kern W and Indest D, Was safe sex required that have good “safe” companion?

Pilkington CJ, Kern W and Indest D, Was safe sex required that have good “safe” companion?

21. Ott MA ainsi que al., New trading-out-of ranging from hormone contraceptives and you will condoms certainly teenagers, Perspectives for the Sexual and you will Reproductive Health, 2002, 34(1):6–fourteen.

twenty-two. Wilson EK and you may Koo Hp, Connections between lower-money women’s matchmaking properties as well as their birth control play with, Views towards Sexual and you will Reproductive Fitness, 2008, 40(3):171–179.

23. Aalsma MC mais aussi al., Loved ones and you may pal closeness so you’re able to teenage sexual people within the relationship to condom explore, Diary away from Adolescent Fitness, 2006, 38(3):173–178.

24. Sayegh MA mais aussi al., This new developmental association from dating top quality, hormonal birth prevention solutions and you may condom low-use one of teenage women, Log away from Adolescent Wellness, 2006, 39(3):388–395.

25. Umphrey L and you can Sherblom J, Relational connection and you will dangers in order to relationship fix desires: affects to the condom explore, Log off American School Wellness, 2007, 56(1):61–68.

27. Manning WD et al., Young adult dating dating and the handling of sexual risk, Population Look and Policy Remark, 2012, 31(2):165–185.

28. Manlove J et al., Teenager moms and dads from inside the foster worry: risk facts and you may outcomes for teens and their people, Browse Short-term, Washington, DC: Youngster Style, 2011.

29. DiClemente RJ et al., Sexual risk practices with the with earlier sex partners: an examination of black colored teenage people, Sexually Sent Disease 2002, 29(1):20–24.

thirty-two. Fortenberry JD mais aussi al., Condom explore once the a purpose of amount of time in the fresh and you will centered teenage sexual relationships, Western Journal out of Societal Fitness, 2002, 92(2):211–213.

33. Manlove JS, Ryan S and Franzetta K, Exposure and you can defensive circumstances associated with the change to a primary sexual connection with an adult lover, Record away from Teenage Fitness, 2007, 40(2):135–143.

34. Manlove J, Ryan S and you can Franzetta K, Contraceptive play with activities across the teens’ sexual dating, paper exhibited at the annual fulfilling of one’s Population Relationship of America, Philadelphia, .

thirty-five. Manning WD, Giordano Desktop computer and Longmore MA, Linking: the partnership contexts out of “nonrelationship” sex, Diary off Adolescent Lookup, 2006, 21(5):459–483.

36. Carlson MJ and Furstenberg FF, Jr, The effects of multiple-partnered virility getting adult information and relationship, report presented during the yearly conference of your own Connection to have Social Policy Analysis and Government, Arizona, DC, .

37. Lichter DT and you will Graefe DR, Looking for a mate? The brand new marital and you may cohabitation records out of unwed parents, in: Wu LL and you will Wolfe B, eds., Away from Wedlock: Grounds and Outcomes away from Nonmarital Fertility, Nyc: Russell Sage Foundation, 2001, pp. 317–343.

forty. Kirby D, Growing Solutions 2007: Search Findings on the Programs to reduce Teen Pregnancy and really cute Balinese girl you can Sexually Carried Sickness, Washington, DC: National Promotion to end Teenager and Unexpected Maternity, 2007.

41. Kirby D, The fresh impact off programs to increase birth prevention explore certainly adult women: a review of experimental and you will quasi-experimental training, Point of views on the Sexual and Reproductive Fitness, 2008, 40(1):34–41.

Author’s Affiliations

Jennifer Manlove are program area movie director and you will elderly search scientist, Kate Welti is lookup scientist, E Wildsmith is elder look researcher and you can Megan Barry try search specialist, every within Youngster Style, Bethesda, MD.

History

In the first research, that used a region-urban area attempt out of adolescents inside the Ohio, Manning and associates nine categorized relationship features with the one list from self-confident functions (eg close self-disclosure, passionate like and relationships salience) plus one index out of negative properties (such as for example dispute and nonexclusivity). It unearthed that higher results toward either directory was in fact of reduced condom structure. Detailed analyses along with recommended that a combination of large confident and you can large negative scores try of reduced condom structure.

Inside for every single round, players were questioned « As the time away from last interview, are you presently during the a matchmaking relationships for which you believe away from on your own as part of two? » We experienced respondents to settle an internet dating relationships once they responded yes incase brand new companion is a recently available dating mate, rather than a spouse, cohabiting spouse otherwise previous mate. Same-sex relationship relationship and people where in fact the respondent had in earlier times cohabited toward mate were omitted. Overall, 4,013 respondents stated a recently available dating relationships throughout 2002–2005. Of your own leftover respondents, 553 weren’t about attempt inside cycles of great interest, step 1,876 had been cohabiting or hitched, and you will 2,542 had no current relationships relationship. Participants within test have been aged 18–twenty six.

Relationship connection try according to a couple of methods. The original try a 0–10 measure where respondents rated the likelihood which they and its mate could well be to each other from inside the 6 months. A get out of zero indicated absolutely no way; good ten indicated 100% probability. We categorized so it likelihood just like the reasonable (lower than 6), medium (6–9) otherwise high (10). Into the second way of measuring connection, i integrated a changeable to own whether the couples got chatted about wedding or cohabitation; responses were categorized since discussed none, chatted about cohabitation otherwise discussed relationship. (Participants exactly who advertised with chatted about each other cohabitation and you will relationships have been provided regarding the relationship class.)

Heterogeneous birth prevention outcomes contained in this longer term relationships may also help describe all the way down contraceptive surface for the lengthened teenage dating, even with higher probability of actually ever-the means to access contraceptives. thirty-two, 33 Earlier studies have interpreted that it shopping for from the positing that partners are able to periodically forgo birth control use in much more serious relationships; 32, 34 however, all of our results suggest that quicker birth-control use can be focused inside the long-emergency room name relationship described as highest disagreement minimizing relationship.

Acknowledgments

20. Ku L, Sonenstein Florida and you may Pleck JH, The fresh figure of younger men’s condom fool around with during the and you can all over relationships, Friends Think Viewpoints, 1994, 26(6):246–251.

Laisser un commentaire

Votre adresse e-mail ne sera pas publiée.