Companion choices in internet dating
Felmlee, D. H. (2001). Out of appealing to terrible: Disenchantment that have an intimate lover. Sociological Viewpoints, forty two, 263-280. [ Backlinks ]
Fiore, An excellent. T., & Donath, J. (2005). Homophily from inside the matchmaking: Whenever are you willing to for example somebody instance on your own? CHI, appointment for the people circumstances for the measuring systems. 1317-1374. [ Links ]
Furman, W. (1985)patibility and you may incompatibility in youngsters’ peer and you can cousin matchmaking. Inside W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and you will in conflict matchmaking (pp. 61-87). Nyc: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Backlinks ]
Gattis, K. S., Berns, S., Simpson, L. Elizabeth., & Christensen, A great. (2004). Wild birds of a great feather otherwise unusual wild birds? Connections certainly character dimensions, similarity, and you may ily Psychology, cuatro, 564-574. [ Website links ]
Gaunt, Roentgen. (2006). Couples resemblance and you will relationship satisfaction: Is comparable spouses happier. Diary of Character, 74, 1401-1420. [ Links ]
Goffman, Age. (1952). To the air conditioning the mark out: Some aspect of type so you’re able to incapacity. Psychiatry, fifteen, 451-463. [ Links ]
Gonzaga, Grams. C., Campos, B., & Bradbury, T. (2007). Similarity, convergence, and relationship fulfillment inside the relationship and you may married couples. Diary away https://internationalwomen.net/sv/heta-vietnamesiska-flickor/ from Character and you may Personal Mindset, 93, 34-48. [ Backlinks ]
Individual Relationship, fifteen, 281-295
Hatfield, Age., & Sprecher, S. (1986). Reflect, mirror: The significance of seems when you look at the lifestyle. Albany: State University of brand new York Drive. [ Hyperlinks ]
Hatfield, Elizabeth., & Sprecher, S. (2009). Complimentary theory. In H. T. Reis & S. Sprecher (Eds.), Encyclopedia of person relationships (Vol. dos, pp. 10651067). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. [ Hyperlinks ]
Hatfield, Elizabeth., Traupmann, J., Sprecher, S., Utne, Yards., & Hay, J. (1985). Security and you may romantic relationships: Latest browse. Within the W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and you will in conflict matchmaking (pp. 91-117). Ny: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Website links ]
Hitsch, G. J., Hortacsu, An excellent., & Ariely, D. (2010). Complimentary and sorting into the matchmaking. Western Financial Feedback, 100, 130-163. [ Links ]
Houran, J., Lange, Roentgen., Rentfrow, J. P., & Bruckner, K. H. (2004). Do on line relationships testing functions? A review from first proof getting a publicized ‘predictive brand of erican Record out of Psychology, six, 507-526. [ Website links ]
Houts, Roentgen. Meters., Robins, Elizabeth., & Huston, T. L. (1996)patibility in addition to growth of preily, 58, 7-20. [ Backlinks ]
Huston, T., Niehuis, S., & Smith, S. (2001). The early marital root away from conjugal worry and you may divorce case. Newest Rules in Mental Science, 10, 116-119. [ Links ]
Ickes, W. (1985). Inclusion. When you look at the W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and you can incompatible dating (pp. 1-7). New york: Springer-Verlag. [ Backlinks ]
Ickes, W., & Charania, Meters. Roentgen. (2009)patibility. From inside the H. T. Reis & S. Sprecher (Eds.), Encyclopedia of human relationship (Vol. step 1, pp. 283-286). Newbury Playground, CA: Sage. [ Backlinks ]
Kalick, S. Meters., & Hamilton III, T. E. (1986). The newest coordinating theory reexamined. Journal regarding Identification and you may Public Mindset, 51 , 673-682. [ Website links ]
Karney, B. Roentgen., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). The brand new longitudinal span of relationship top quality and balance: A look at concept, measures, and you may look. Emotional Bulletin, 118, 3-34. [ Hyperlinks ]
Karney, B. Roentgen., & Bradbury, T. N. (1997). Neuroticism, relationship interaction, and trajectory out-of relationship pleasure. Record of Personality and you can Personal Mindset, 72, 1075-1092. [ Website links ]
Karney, B. Roentgen., & Bradbury, T. Letter. (2005). Contextual has an effect on toward wedding: Effects having policy and you will input. Latest Rules for the Mental Science, fourteen, 171-174. [ Links ]
Kelley, H. H., Berscheid, Age., Christensen, Good., Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L., Levinger, G. Peterson, D.R. (1983). Analyzing intimate matchmaking. When you look at the H. H. Kelley, Age. Berscheid, A great. Christensen, J. H. Harvey, T. L. Huston, G. Levinger. D. Roentgen. Peterson (Eds.), Intimate relationships (pp. 20-67). New york: Freeman. [ Backlinks ]
